{
  "abstract": "Objective This qualitative analysis aimed to explore the experiences of men who have sex with men (MSM) providing self-taken oropharyngeal, rectal, meatal and urine specimens, and pooling genital and extragenital specimens for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT).Method MSM participants from the MYSTIC study consented to participate in an online focus group. They were encouraged to share and discuss their experiences of self-taken oropharyngeal, rectal, meatal and urine specimens, and the pooling of specimens. The focus group was recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis, using a framework approach, generated themes and highlighted their experiences.Results Seven MSM, with experience of providing self-taken specimens for gonorrhoea and chlamydia testing, consented and contributed to a focus group in April 2024. They described difficulties they experienced in producing and handling urine specimens. They had concerns about urine spilling, but believed it was more accurate than meatal specimens. They described learning how to take oropharyngeal specimens, including being shown by clinicians and using a mirror. They were unsure how deep, and for how long, to take rectal specimens, and whether the swab should be twisted. They described feeling embarrassed at providing faecally contaminated specimens. They found the meatal specimens easy to perform but were concerned whether they were taking the specimen correctly. Overall, MSM preferred meatal specimens over urine and were willing to compensate some test accuracy for meatal specimens rather than urine. Some found the pooling complicated and were concerned about having an adequate environment to do this in correctly; conversely, some found this easy and quicker.Conclusion These data provide insight into the experiences of MSM providing self-taken samples and pooling them for gonorrhoea and chlamydia testing. Interestingly, MSM preferred self-taken meatal swabs to urine and would accept a slight reduction in diagnostic sensitivity with this specimen.",
  "authors": [
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK",
        "Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Daniel Richardson"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Genitourinary Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, England, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Harriet Wallace"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Genitourinary Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, England, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Janet Wilson"
    }
  ],
  "title": "‘Bish bash bosh’: the experiences of men who have sex with men providing self-taken oropharyngeal, rectal, meatal and first-catch urine specimens, and pooling genital and extragenital specimens for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis detection",
  "uid": "7f56d766-1e0a-545a-b2e4-411350f29d1b"
}