{
  "abstract": "Introduction The use of remote consultations, such as appointments via telephone, video, online or text in sexual and reproductive health services (SRHS) across the UK, has expanded in recent years. This review synthesises grey literature from different organisations to identify current practice and guidance for remote consultations.Methods We searched for a range of grey literature document types, including unpublished reports, evaluations, published standards, guidance, blogs and opinion pieces. The searches were conducted between March 2023 and July 2024 using Google, as well as the Healthcare Management Information Consortium database and preidentified organisational websites (eg, the British Association for Sexual Health and HIV, the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare). Data extracted included terminology, challenges to implementation and linked guidance and equity considerations in the use of remote consultations in SRHS. Narrative synthesis was used to analyse findings.Results The available guidance on implementing and delivering remote SRHS is modest in scope and volume and draws on a sparse evidence base. Existing guidance recommends the use of safeguarding assessments and checklists to support pathways from remote into in-person care. While remote consultations were seen as potentially enhancing equity, challenges included differences in technology access and digital literacy. Equity-related guidance included prioritising disadvantaged groups for in-person appointments and flexible care pathways.Discussion and conclusions The grey literature highlights the potential of remote SRHS to improve access and equity while also identifying risks in implementation and outcomes. There is an ongoing requirement for detailed, evidence-informed guidance that incorporates service user perspectives.",
  "authors": [
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Department of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Charlotte Spurway"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Iestyn Williams"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Christian Bohm"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Whittall Street Clinic, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Oluseyi Cyril Ayinde"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Fiona Burns"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Jo Gibbs"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "PPIE Lead, London, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Jo Josh"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Hywel Dda University Health Board, Carmarthen, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Helen Munro"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Danielle Solomon"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Melvina Woode Owusu"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Whittall Street Clinic, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Jonathan D C Ross"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Department of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Louise J Jackson"
    }
  ],
  "title": "What guidance exists to support remote consultations in sexual and reproductive health services? A review of the policy and practice literature",
  "uid": "32020d8d-b41b-5c09-a5e8-01a76d392910"
}