{
  "abstract": "We thank Hakim and Narouze1 for their interest in our systematic review2 examining implantable peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) for chronic pain. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are challenging undertakings, and we appreciate their insights; however, there are several noteworthy considerations.",
  "authors": [
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA"
      ],
      "name": "Ryan D’Souza"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA",
        "Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA"
      ],
      "name": "Nasir Hussain"
    }
  ],
  "title": "In reply: methodological arguments against evidence synthesis of implantable peripheral nerve stimulation for chronic pain",
  "uid": "395b5ecf-c3e2-5321-93b1-aeb280f9db42"
}