{
  "abstract": "We read with great interest the recent article by Weitzner et al published in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (RAPM).1 The authors addressed an important concept, which is the assessment of the association of peer-review scores with measures of impact for manuscripts submitted and published. The authors extracted reviewer recommendations and linked them to Clarivate citation counts, Google Scholar citations, and Altmetric attention scores. The authors have categorized reviewer assessments into a quantifiable score for analysis. This timely study examines a central question in academic publishing: whether peer-review ratings accurately predict scientific impact.",
  "authors": [
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Department of Anaesthesiology, Ibra Hospital, Ibra, Ash Sharqiyah North Governorate, Oman"
      ],
      "name": "Abhijit Nair"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Care, Ganga Medical Centre and Hospitals Pvt Ltd, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India"
      ],
      "name": "Tuhin Mistry"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Between rigor and recognition: the peer-review paradox",
  "uid": "c244b41a-6656-5a05-8bf4-1921346701b2"
}