{
  "abstract": "Since the 18th century, bedside rounds have been a fundamental component of clinical care, serving as a setting where clinical information is gathered, processed and shared.1 This tradition highlights the importance of maintaining a high level of structure during clinical encounters. Over time, structured tools to guide care have been widely adopted across multiple specialties.2–6 Systematic checklists, in particular, have become the most used form of structured intervention in bedside wards to enhance patient care and safety.7–9 This intervention has been associated with improved non-clinical outcomes, such as communication and adherence to standard protocols.7–9 However, their impact on clinical outcomes remains a matter of debate.10",
  "authors": [
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Department of Neurology, Division of Neurocritical Care, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA"
      ],
      "name": "Gabriel Torrealba-Acosta"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Department of Neurocritical Care, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA"
      ],
      "name": "César E Escamilla-Ocañas"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Checklist conundrum: are we checking the right boxes?",
  "uid": "5f06e9d7-2b5f-5e25-9422-4509954d9067"
}