{
  "abstract": "We created fictional case scenarios that might be managed either in primary or secondary care to compare the approaches of a general practitioner, a neurology trainee and a consultant neurologist. Overall, we found them to be similar, with a preference for an approach of ‘ruling out worst-case scenarios’ but with differences relating to their context and personal risk appetite. A possible diagnosis of functional neurological disorder raised the greatest differences. We discuss these approaches and consider the importance of cognitive strategies, bias and risk appetite in clinical decision-making.",
  "authors": [
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Neurology, Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust, Bath, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Laurence Newrick"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK"
      ],
      "name": "christopher paisey"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Patford House Partnership, Calne, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Simon Church"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Norfolk Community Health and Care NHS Trust, Norwich, UK"
      ],
      "name": "James Heathcote"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Ian Coyle-Gilchrist"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "West Suffolk Hospitals NHS Trust, Bury Saint Edmunds, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Francesca Crawley"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Neurology, Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust, Bath, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Mark Manford"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Who I am affects what I do",
  "uid": "902e1b0e-b9ae-5cc7-b48e-8dd622bb29ad"
}