{
  "abstract": "Smith and Mackie offer a conditional defence of vaccine mandates.1 Their argument is conditional, because it is based on Kiener’s interpersonal consenter-consentee account of consent.2 (Smith and Mackie do not defend this account of consent.)",
  "authors": [
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Politics and IR, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Ben Saunders"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Vaccine mandates impair voluntariness, even if consent-receivers do not",
  "uid": "8d8c79d7-ea46-5963-ba0e-6fa46a1adbe0"
}