{
  "abstract": "The invasiveness of a medical intervention is considered to be morally important and can have a significant influence on acceptability and uptake. De Marco et al propose a novel account of the invasiveness of medical interventions that better reflects the common understanding of the term. Using the example of non-invasive prenatal testing, I develop this account and argue that comparisons should only occur between medical interventions of clinically and morally significant differences.",
  "authors": [
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Monash Bioethics Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia"
      ],
      "name": "Chanelle Warton"
    }
  ],
  "title": "How ‘non-invasive’ is non-invasive prenatal testing?",
  "uid": "374802e2-f303-5aee-a626-03c5865599ae"
}