{
  "abstract": "In 1897 Mark Twain sent a cable to the New York Journal after discovering that the newspaper had published his obituary. Twain noted that while the reporting of his illness had been accurate, ‘the report of my death was an exaggeration’.1 In their provocative editorial ‘Death, authorship, and generative AI—a call for commentaries’, Brian Earp et al consider whether the traditional concept of authorship is undergoing a similar disaggregation.2 They distinguish between five authorship functions—composition, ideation, direction, engagement and accountability—and present arguments for and against identifying authorship with each of these roles.2 In this commentary, I will argue that the death of traditional authorship in scientific research is also an exaggeration.",
  "authors": [
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina, USA"
      ],
      "name": "David Resnik"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Authorship and accountability in the age of generative AI",
  "uid": "a8dba5a1-763b-5fab-b890-6b03fe98acaa"
}