{
  "abstract": "Genetic enhancement technologies are rapidly evolving, but discussions about their use for human enhancement are largely abstract and removed from the socioeconomic environments in which they would be administered. While some scholars engage in discussions about the fairness of distributing genetic enhancements, I argue that the oppressive social structures in which genetic enhancements will be administered categorically undermine our capacities to autonomously value and pursue such technologies. I will draw on long-standing feminist debates around the oppressive and empowering uses of cosmetic enhancements by women to argue that the oppressive nature of patriarchal beauty norms creates a social environment in which women are generally not free to autonomously evaluate their desires for and values of cosmetic enhancements. I then address the concern that declaring such a proposition is itself an unethical restriction on women’s autonomy and that cosmetic enhancements are generally, or presumptively, empowering. I conclude that, like cosmetic enhancements, genetic enhancements are morally harmful insofar as they are not categorically autonomously valued by people.",
  "authors": [
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore"
      ],
      "name": "Sinead Prince"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Autonomy, oppression and genetic enhancements",
  "uid": "b76a53a4-3733-50d1-ade1-3ff22d224582"
}