{
  "abstract": "Many of us have ‘left-right’ fatigue when it comes to news and politics, but for those who care for people with congenital heart disease, the question of how best to treat the subaortic right ventricle (RV) versus the subaortic left is a daily clinical question we enjoy considering. For patients living into adulthood with subaortic, but morphologic RVs (sRVs), depressed systemic systolic function is the rule rather than the exception. Several lesions result in this physiology, the majority of which include atrial switch procedures for D-transposition of the great vessels or L-transposition of the great vessels (L-TGA, ‘congenitally corrected’ transposition). Despite very important differences in microstructure and macrostructure, sRVs are treated with the same medications that have been shown to benefit failing left ventricles (LVs), but without robust evidence supporting the extrapolation.",
  "authors": [
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Electrophysiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA"
      ],
      "name": "Michael S Lloyd"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Surprising and essential answer to the ‘Left-Right Question’ in complex congenital heart disease",
  "uid": "3cd5bdde-81b2-5d40-aa38-aea496686823"
}