{
  "abstract": "We read with great interest the study by Bang et al, comparing endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) with surgical gastrojejunostomy (SGJ) for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO).1 They found that EUS-GE significantly reduced reinterventions for recurrent obstruction, consistent with earlier reports.2 However, another recent randomised controlled trial (RCT) and a meta-analysis of retrospective studies indicate similar reintervention rates for EUS-GE and SGJ.3 4 To clarify these discrepancies, we performed a pooled analysis of the two available RCTs and explored reasons for the differing outcomes (see PROSPERO CRD420251176835 and online supplemental table S1/figure S1). Statistical analyses were performed using R (V.4.2.1). Study characteristics are shown in online supplemental table 2.SP110.1136/gutjnl-2025-337514.supp1Supplementary data",
  "authors": [
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China"
      ],
      "name": "Qingzhou Kong"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China"
      ],
      "name": "Baobao Wang"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China"
      ],
      "name": "Yueyue Li"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China"
      ],
      "name": "Rui Ji"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China"
      ],
      "name": "Yanqing Li"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Endoscopic gastroenterostomy for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: the need for reintervention is variable",
  "uid": "61caa1b5-dc8d-5fb0-bc5e-752d9a714868"
}