{
  "abstract": "Early formulations of evidence-based medicine and healthcare emphasised the ability of health professionals to formulate questions, search for and critically appraise individual studies to inform their practice. As the field matured, systematic evidence syntheses increasingly became the preferred basis for decisions about care. 1 In this context, health professionals seeking current evidence or guidance now rarely start with primary research studies.2 In 2026, users are more likely to begin with preappraised sources (eg, clinical practice guidelines and point-of-care evidence summaries) and increasingly, information retrieved from generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools.3",
  "authors": [
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "GIMBE Foundation, Bologna, Italy",
        "Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands"
      ],
      "name": "Tiziano Innocenti"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada"
      ],
      "name": "Gordon Guyatt"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "GIMBE Foundation, Bologna, Italy"
      ],
      "name": "Nino Cartabellotta"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia"
      ],
      "name": "Paul Glasziou"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia"
      ],
      "name": "Dragan Ilic"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK"
      ],
      "name": "David Nunan"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Educating health professionals in evidence-based practice in 2026",
  "uid": "6968d34e-44d2-5049-8ba7-b52e9a9434ae"
}