{
  "abstract": "The work of transforming scientific publications into tools that can support people in comparing treatments, tests and other interventions has been driven by efforts to support shared decision-making. The International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration has published many articles that guide this process. IPDAS, and others in this field, have considered the challenges of representing complex concepts such as effect sizes, ORs and relative risk rates in terms and formats that are easier to understand by people with varying levels of health literacy and numeracy.",
  "authors": [
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA"
      ],
      "name": "Glyn Elwyn"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Centre Universitaire de Médecine Générale et Santé Publique, Lausanne, Switzerland",
        "University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland"
      ],
      "name": "Marie Anne Durand"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneve, Switzerland"
      ],
      "name": "Thomas Agoritsas"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "DynaMed Decisions, EBSCO Clinical Decisions, EBSCO Information Services, Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA",
        "Open Door Clinic, Burlington, North Carolina, USA"
      ],
      "name": "Martin Mayer"
    }
  ],
  "title": "How to best convey continuous outcomes in patient decision aids",
  "uid": "db367349-1471-5532-a00d-da9a4ab93cba"
}