{
  "abstract": "This paper is part of a series from the Cochrane Rapid Review Methods Group providing methodological guidance for rapid reviews (RRs). The purpose of this paper is to consider how RR approaches might be applied when the question being addressed requires a broader description of existing knowledge or a big-picture view of the evidence.",
  "authors": [
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon tyne, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Fiona Campbell"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "ScHARR, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Anthea Sutton"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia"
      ],
      "name": "Danielle Pollock"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada"
      ],
      "name": "Chantelle Garritty"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Dalla Lana School of Public Health and Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, University of Toronto and St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada"
      ],
      "name": "Andrea C Tricco"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon tyne, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Lena Schmidt"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "La Trobe University School of Psychology and Public Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia"
      ],
      "name": "Hanan Khalil"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on rapid scoping, mapping and evidence and gap map (‘Big Picture Reviews’)",
  "uid": "98e071b6-03ec-59d0-9315-08fdc4647cc4"
}