{
  "abstract": "Introduction The prevalence of common mental disorders in resettled refugee populations is nearly three times higher than in the general population. The WHO recommends Problem Management Plus (PM+), a brief non-specialist delivered intervention for reducing common mental disorders. To identify key factors to optimise implementation, we conducted a qualitative cross-sectional study to investigate contextual determinants shaping PM+ implementation during a nationwide scale-up of PM+ in Switzerland.Methods We conducted in-depth key informant interviews in the German-speaking and French-speaking parts of Switzerland (September 2023 and January 2025). Design and analysis of interviews was guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Themes were added both inductively and deductively and categorised into challenges and opportunities for widespread PM+ service delivery.Results We interviewed 30 stakeholders: 12 policymakers, 5 government leaders, 5 specialists and implementers and 8 non-specialist peer-providers. Whilst stakeholders were enthusiastic about the value of PM+, several limitations to its routine delivery were noted. These related to limited quality standards and control for non-specialist delivered interventions that prevented formal categorisation within the health system. Endorsement by professional associations including best-practice standards was thought to facilitate such formalised recognition. Prioritising mental health indicators within Cantonal integration programmes was perceived to facilitate funding via the national integration agenda. All stakeholders pointed towards blended co-financing pathways to ensure the longer-term sustainability of PM+ in Switzerland.Conclusions The routine delivery of PM+ within health and integration systems presented substantial challenges and opportunities. Longer-term sustainability of PM+ may be feasible with blended financing, tailored Cantonal health and integration agendas, and established quality control standards for PM+ delivery that include formal recognition of non-specialists within the mental health system.",
  "authors": [
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia"
      ],
      "name": "Dharani Keyan"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Department of Consultation-Liaison-Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland"
      ],
      "name": "Julia Spaaij"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Department of Consultation-Liaison-Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland"
      ],
      "name": "Matthis Schick"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia",
        "Black Dog Institute, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia"
      ],
      "name": "Richard A Bryant"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Department of Consultation-Liaison-Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland"
      ],
      "name": "Naser Morina"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Determinants of WHO’s Problem Management Plus (PM+) uptake within health and integration sectors in Switzerland: a qualitative study",
  "uid": "3c510dc2-78ba-5054-8caf-d376ec4d05e9"
}