{
  "abstract": "Objectives Many industries where safety is a priority (eg, aviation) use safety management systems (SMSs), but evidence on their use in healthcare is needed to determine whether they could support patient safety improvement. We investigated the application of national-level SMSs to patient safety in terms of effectiveness, implementation and experience.Design Systematic review using a case study approach.Data sources We identified patient safety organisations in each country and searched their websites. We also searched MEDLINE (in December 2023) and Embase (via Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO) and Web of Science (in February 2024).Eligibility criteria Any evidence from five high-income countries that have publicly funded healthcare systems with universal coverage: Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand and the Netherlands. We included publications on the effectiveness, implementation or experience of the patient safety approach in each country.Data extraction and synthesis Included evidence was summarised and mapped onto an initial analytical framework based on analysis of SMSs in high-risk industries, enabling cross-country comparisons. Drafts were shared with experts from patient safety organisations in each country for comment. Formal quality appraisal was not possible as most evidence was non-evaluative.Results 53 publications were included, from Australia (5), Canada (7), Ireland (8), New Zealand (9) and the Netherlands (24). Only the Netherlands implemented a patient safety programme explicitly based on an SMS approach. Some aspects of patient safety in hospitals improved as a result, but there was significant variation in both the implementation of the programme and attributed outcomes.In the other four countries, the main components of an SMS were identified to some extent, along with evidence that their patient safety approaches had been influenced by concepts from high-risk industries and ‘safety science’ more widely.Conclusions Emerging ideas from high-risk industries (beyond SMSs) and broader safety science have influenced all countries, reflecting increasing awareness of the need for initiatives to be context-specific to be successful. However, their implementation and impact need further evaluation.PROSPERO registration number CRD42023487512.",
  "authors": [
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Exeter HSDR Evidence Synthesis Centre, Department of Health & Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Siân de Bell"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Exeter HSDR Evidence Synthesis Centre, Department of Health & Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Zhivko Zhelev"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Exeter HSDR Evidence Synthesis Centre, Department of Health & Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Alison Bethel"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Exeter HSDR Evidence Synthesis Centre, Department of Health & Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Maria Clarke"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Exeter HSDR Evidence Synthesis Centre, Department of Health & Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Rob Anderson"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Exeter HSDR Evidence Synthesis Centre, Department of Health & Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Jo Thompson Coon"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Implementation of safety management systems (SMS) in healthcare: a systematic review and international comparison",
  "uid": "1bf431fe-964a-5eac-b072-b8a51f7922ca"
}