{
  "abstract": "There is increasing attention paid to solidarity in global health, but its substance and definitions remain contested. We explore the tensions between global health institutions’ historic approaches to sex work, their commitment to health and human rights and how these are connected to or disconnected from solidarity. We foreground the protracted and incomplete evolution from international health approaches to sex workers as spreaders of pathogens that should be punished, to sex work health programmes that are situated within human rights principles. Thus, substantial resources and material changes to laws, policies and programmes are required to action claims of ‘standing in solidarity’ with sex workers. We argue that the drastic cuts to global health funding initiated by the Trump Administration in January 2025 require careful consideration of what ‘solidarity’ with the most marginalised entails and bold action.",
  "authors": [
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "The EthicsLab, University of Cape Town Department of Medicine, Observatory, South Africa",
        "African Centre for Migration & Society, University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg Faculty of Humanities, Johannesburg, South Africa"
      ],
      "name": "Marlise Linda Richter"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Principal of Clear Eyed Consulting, New York, New York, USA"
      ],
      "name": "M H Ditmore"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "The EthicsLab, University of Cape Town Department of Medicine, Observatory, South Africa"
      ],
      "name": "Jantina de Vries"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Demanding solidarity, not salvation: sex work and global health",
  "uid": "86b549fd-89ee-51e7-ba37-f4682f213bc1"
}