{
  "abstract": "Both sides of the debate about the rise in neurodivergence diagnoses - those who think that the conditions have been long underdiagnosed and are now being correctly recognised and those who think that normal variation is now being inappropriately pathologised - rest partly on the assumption that there is a fixed substrate of patient “experience,” which is being appraised differently by biomedicine.1 The contentious debate about whether conditions are “real,” rather than socially constructed, again rears its head.",
  "authors": [
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Newcastle, UK",
        "Institute of Medical Humanities, Durham University, Durham, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Jonathan Coates"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Rise in autism and ADHD: patient experience is not fixed",
  "uid": "6cb1260f-74b2-55c9-97a1-7fff4c6047d2"
}