{
  "abstract": "Imagine attending a busy shift in a paediatric emergency department (ED). You have just read two recent and rigorous publications; one facilitated risk stratification for clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI) following minor trauma, while the second does the same for lethal paediatric malignancies following CT. Your next patient presents with minor head trauma. Evidence now estimates their risks for both ciTBI and for iatrogenic malignancies at equilibrium; 1:5000. What would you do? What disparity between these odds should change your response, and what could?",
  "authors": [
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Department of Emergency Medicine, Schneider Children's Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel",
        "Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel"
      ],
      "name": "Nir Samuel"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy"
      ],
      "name": "Silvia Bressan"
    },
    {
      "affiliations": [
        "Department of Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, London, UK",
        "Faculty of Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases, Section of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, London, UK"
      ],
      "name": "Ruud Gerard Nijman"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Decisions under duress and the limits of data",
  "uid": "a9240e81-d634-56ca-81af-a0802051e62a"
}